MC
MandarinClips Cinema Corpus
《Coroner's Diary》 S1·E36 (27:13) HSK 7
píng hé rèn dìng xíng xiōng rén jiù shì jìn wáng

凭何认定 行凶人就是晋王

“what made you so sure Prince Jin was the killer?”

《Coroner's Diary》 S1·E36
TIMECODE: 27:13 · 1080P MASTER AUDIO

THE DIALOGUE REEL

1+1+1 SPOKEN CONTINUITY
[-1] PREVIOUS TURN sī zì cáng nì le zhēn zhèng de xiōng qì nǐ jì méi yǒu zhǎo dào zuì zhèng

私自藏匿了真正的凶器 你既没有找到罪证

“look innocent. Since you never found the weapon,”

píng hé rèn dìng xíng xiōng rén jiù shì jìn wáng CURRENT FOCUS

凭何认定 行凶人 就是 晋王

“what made you so sure Prince Jin was the killer?”

[+1] FOLLOW-UP TURN jìn wáng shì bèi dāng chǎng zhuō ná ruò bú shì jìn wáng

晋王是被当场捉拿 若不是晋王

“Prince Jin was caught at the scene. If not him,”

Subtitles synced to millisecond timecode Browse Show Clips →
Scene: Historical & Court
Function: CHALLENGING ACCUSATION
Tone: CHALLENGING
Emotion: SKEPTICISM
WHAT THEY REALLY MEAN (PRAGMATIC SUBTEXT)
“You have no proof, so you cannot frame the King of Jin as the murderer!”
💡 Cultural Insight: Imperial Judicial Evidence

In traditional Chinese courtroom and palace dramas, accusing royalty requires ironclad physical evidence (such as the murder weapon); otherwise, the accuser risks severe punishment for slander.

INTENT TAGS: #challenging #defending #questioning_evidence #rebuttal
🧩

LEARNING CHUNKS & PARTICLES

2 CHUNKS · 0 PARTICLES
凭何 SPOKEN CHUNK

on what grounds; by what right

A literary or historical equivalent of the modern '凭什么' (píng shénme), used in period dramas or formal writing to challenge someone's authority or logic.

行凶人 SPOKEN CHUNK

assailant; perpetrator of a violent crime

Used in legal, police, or historical investigation contexts to refer to the person who committed the physical attack or murder.

🏮

VOCABULARY & EXPRESSIONS

2 EXPR · 0 GRAMMAR
CROSS-CINEMA CORPUS BOARD · PARALLEL SCENES

Parallel Spoken Cinema Scenes (语义近邻切片)

EXPLORE BY SEMANTIC SIMILARITY
《Coroner's Diary》 S1·E36 (27:13) · Authentic Cinema Dialogue Corpus